First-borns are more likely to become CEOs
The headline in USA Today reads: "First-born kids become CEO material." Here's how the paper sums up the article that goes with that headline.
"Scientists have found that first-born children are smarter than their brothers and sisters. It appears they are more likely to succeed in business, too."
Birth order studies seem to come in clusters. They also seem to come up with a variety of findings. In 2006, researchers at Ohio State found that birth order had no affect on intelligence scores.
Frank Sulloway, in his 1996 book, Born to Rebel: Birth Order, Family Dynamics and Creative Lives, held that firstborns grow up to be rule-abiding conformists. Kevin Leman, writing a few years later, told us that firstborns turned into well-organized perfectionists. His book was titled The Birth Order Book: Why You Are the Way You Are.
This is not a new thing. In 1874 Sir Francis Galton studied top English scientists and observed that a surprising number of them were firstborns.
For its article, USA Today asked Vistage, which describes itself as "the world's largest CEO membership organization," to survey its members on their birth order. They received 1582 responses, of which 43 percent were firstborn, 23 percent were born last and 33 percent were somewhere in between.
Again, so what?
This makes for fascinating reading, but ultimately that's all. The reason is that you don't manage or promote or evaluate people based on their birth order. For that matter you shouldn't be doing it based on their generation, hair color, or anything else except their strengths, their behavior and their performance.
The fact is that the people who work for us are far too diverse to be dealt with in any way except individually. And besides, you can read the data in lots of ways.
Note that 56 percent of the responding CEOs were not firstborn. And, as far as I know, no one ever counts only children as lastborn, even though they qualify for that as well as firstborn.
If you're responsible for the performance of a group, read these studies and enjoy them. But deal with your people based on the way they perform, on the way they act, and on their potential. Let the scientists worry about birth order.
Wally's Working Supervisor's Support Kit is a collection of information and tools to help working supervisors do a better job. It's based on what Wally's learned in over twenty years of supervisory skills training. Click here to check it out.
Request your free copy of "Meeting the Challenges of the Boomer Brain Drain: An integrated approach."
Wally Bock has helped people learn to be great bosses for more than a quarter century. His latest book, Performance Talk: The One-on-One Part of Leadership, makes learning key leadership principles almost effortless by teaching through a story and providing lists of resources for further growth.
Click here to find out more about Wally's coaching services.
For weekly tips and resources pointers, check our Wally Bock's Three Star Leadership Letter.
Click here to find out more about having Wally speak to your company or convention.


Wally, your explanation of how to read such articles and "research" and the conclusion about what to do with them are both sage.
Yet I have to wonder:
Is the willingness to spend the time needed to find truth greater than the desire for a speedy facade of pseudo "scientific evidence"?
Reply to this
Speedy facade of pseudo scientific evidence wins almost every time. I think it's human nature to seek the magical solution, the one magic formula that will usher in an age of profits and good feeling. Today we have so many quick solutions in so many areas that we think they're normal. We look for microwavable wisdom that we can pull out of the freezer and zap, producing the perfect solution without thought or effort.
Reply to this
It's easy for scientist to want to point to factor "X" and call it evidence, but what they don't look at is the bigger picture and how things interconnect.
I was the first born in my family, and I tend to follow the "traditional" first-born rules (educated, leader, etc.) but this was because I was brought up to help rear my younger siblings.
This isn't always the case, which is why these studies which look for a single factor, can't find a common thread...because there is more than one factor at work. However, the "speedy facade" makes for better quotes and increased likelihood of getting published - which can lead to more research grants.
Reply to this
Good points. Thanks for sharing them and thanks for dropping by.
Reply to this
I hope that is true because I am the eldest. But I agree to Walter, It depends on the genes. I think firstborn child is more responsible because society rule them to be one and expects them to be one. So that is why they are the one in the high level positions.
Reply to this
Thanks for stopping by. Good luck in your quest.
Reply to this