If it isn't training, putting e in front won't make it better

 
Subscribe to the Three Star Leadership Blog
The Working Supervisor's Support Kit is a collection of information and tools to help working supervisors do a better job. It's based on what Wally's learned in over twenty years of supervisory skills training.
For weekly tips and resources pointers, check Wally's Three Star Leadership Letter
Find out more about having Wally speak to your company or convention.
Find out more about Wally's coaching services.
View Wally Bock's profile on LinkedIn

As part of its continuing effort to make you wonder what news is really news, Workforce Management just reposted a February article by Gary Kranz titled: "E-Learning Hits Its Stride." Here's the teaser.

"Despite some differing numbers, two widely regarded and independent reports on the U.S. training market conclude that 30 percent of employee learning last year occurred online. The question of whether workplace training improves worker performance remains unanswered, however."

The biggest question, as Kranz points out, is that it's not clear yet whether e-learning actually has an impact on performance. Based on my forty years in business we're not going to get that answer any time soon because we don't do the things necessary to determine if any training, e- or otherwise improves performance.

We don't measure learning. Instead we ask participants to evaluate the room, the instructor, the lunch, the presentation, and the location. We ask them to answer questions about everything except whether they learned something they can use on the job.

We don't set people up to succeed back on the job. Marshall Goldsmith studied 86,000 people who went through leadership training. What made the big difference in whether they changed behavior in a positive way wasn't what happened in the classroom.

Instead, Goldsmith found that the people who went back to work and "practiced what was taught, discussed what they learned with coworkers and did regular 'progress checks' to gauge improvement" were the ones that improved. Yet companies do virtually nothing to support that critical set of behaviors after the classroom door swings shut.

There are also two important sets of terms that need definition and differentiation. We need to distinguish between training and simply providing information. And we need to decide what's part of e-learning. Today that term covers everything from structured training in how to run a cash register to the use of wikis to share experience among research scientists.

The most important issue here isn't whether e-learning is good or bad or whether it's increasing in usage. The most important issue is that we spend money on "training" without defining what we want and how we'll measure success.

Wally's Working Supervisor's Support Kit is a collection of information and tools to help working supervisors do a better job. It's based on what Wally's learned in over twenty years of supervisory skills training. Click here to check it out.

 
Subscribe to the Three Star Leadership Blog

Request your free copy of "Meeting the Challenges of the Boomer Brain Drain: An integrated approach."

Wally Bock has helped people learn to be great bosses for more than a quarter century. His latest book, Performance Talk: The One-on-One Part of Leadership, makes learning key leadership principles almost effortless by teaching through a story and providing lists of resources for further growth.

View Wally Bock's profile on LinkedIn

Click here to find out more about Wally's coaching services.

For weekly tips and resources pointers, check our Wally Bock's Three Star Leadership Letter.

Click here to find out more about having Wally speak to your company or convention.

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

  • 5/30/2008 6:39 PM kwijibo wrote:
    A few years back I taught a technical computer course for my company. I had classes jammed with production line staff who, at the time, had no access to the computer resources that we were working with. Each class went the same way: "My manager made me come. I don't want to do this. Why do I have to be here?" It took awhile before we discovered the reason. Their promotions to Production II had been denied because they lacked a particular trade skill. They felt that the company should train them in the skills they needed for their tasks and they said so in an employee satisfaction survey. Someone had bulletized the survey result: "Production: Training." It resulted in an employee development goal: "One training course every 6 months for every line worker." Our only formal training program was computer focused, and on the alphabetical list of computer courses, mine happened to come first. So they sat through what must have been a dreadfully dull few hours for them and came out "trained."
    Reply to this
  • 5/31/2008 10:20 AM Steve Roesler wrote:
    Wally, this is a home run.

    Recently had a request that got me back to the nuts and bolts of training.

    Client had put together a "training" program for admin assistants, an area in which I don't usually usually find myself. They needed to upgrade their proficiency in MS Office--something else I don't "do." So I asked the admins how the first session went. They said it was "interesting"--always a telltale response

    It turns out that someone lectured and used a bunch of screenshots to "train" the people, who were taking notes. Needless to say, they were bored stiff and barely remembered anything.

    So, for the second round, I told the IT guy to bring in 10 laptops loaded with the software. Asked each of the admins to submit 5 things that they really needed to learn how to "do". Sat with the instructor for a total of 8 hours and designed the program so that she would click and demonstrate on the big screen and participants would follow and do the same.

    The result: The participants asked to stay for two more hours of their own time because they were actually learning how to do what they needed to do.

    Seemed simple to me. But I was reminded again that "learning" really is a field of expertise that isn't obvious to many well-intentioned folks. It also drove home the fact that when people ARE really learning, they'll do most anything to keep it going.
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.