Abolish the performance review
|
Subscribe to the Three Star Leadership Blog |
| The Working Supervisor's Support Kit is a collection of information and tools to help working supervisors do a better job. It's based on what Wally's learned in over twenty years of supervisory skills training. |
| For weekly tips and resources pointers, check Wally's Three Star Leadership Letter |
| Find out more about having Wally speak to your company or convention. |
| Find out more about Wally's coaching services. |
|
|
Yesterday's Wall Street Journal contained an article titled: "Get Rid of the Performance Review!" UCLA professor Samuel Culbert offers "seven reasons why I find performance reviews ill-advised and bogus."
"Bogus" is the kind of word academics use when they want us to think they're in touch with what's really going on in the world. The article itself makes some good points, but it's mostly full of grand, unsupported generalizations.
Dr. Culbert, naturally, has an alternative to the current performance appraisal system as practiced in most companies. He describes his idea as "twoside, reciprocally accountable, performance previews."
If the performance appraisal as practiced now is bogus, than this idea is bogus as well. It's another annual or semi-annual ritual that effectively ignores the only performance appraisals that actually have an effect on performance.
Those are the appraisals done every day about specific issues by supervisors with team members. If you make that work, you can set almost any review system atop it and that system will work fine. Ignore the day-to-day part, though, and your system won't work. So here's what to do.
Start by selecting people for supervisory work who have at least a shot at being good at it. They should like helping others succeed. They should be willing to talk to others about performance and behavior. They should be willing to work at communicating.
Teach those supervisors how to set clear expectations and check to see if they turn into performance. Teach them how to follow up. Teach them the skills of effective, behavior-changing communication.
Hold them accountable for their supervisory behavior and the performance of their team. Support them on the job.
If you do that, here's what you're likely to get. I know this because I've studied top performing supervisors and this is what they do.
They touch base with their people a lot. They use every encounter with a team member as an opportunity to coach, counsel, encourage, and correct. They seek feedback on their own behavior.
Because of those behaviors there is better performance, fewer confrontations and higher morale. There are also no surprises at the formal appraisal ritual.
When that comes around you'll see those good supervisors take more time than their less effective peers at appraisal sessions. You'll see them spend the interview focused on the future instead of the past.
The solution to today's mostly dysfunctional performance appraisal systems isn't to create another superstructure of a system with different forms and jargon. It's to make sure that real, effective performance appraisal happens several times a day on the front lines.
Wally's Working Supervisor's Support Kit is a collection of information and tools to help working supervisors do a better job. It's based on what Wally's learned in over twenty years of supervisory skills training. Click here to check it out.
Request your free copy of "Meeting the Challenges of the Boomer Brain Drain: An integrated approach."
Wally Bock has helped people learn to be great bosses for more than a quarter century. His latest book, Performance Talk: The One-on-One Part of Leadership, makes learning key leadership principles almost effortless by teaching through a story and providing lists of resources for further growth.
Click here to find out more about Wally's coaching services.
For weekly tips and resources pointers, check our Wally Bock's Three Star Leadership Letter.
Click here to find out more about having Wally speak to your company or convention.





Wally - You're right! In my work for the past 45 years, we've used Role Descriptions, Performance Goals, and Learning Plans to make everything transparent on a daily basis - as described in my book LEADERSHIP: THINKING, BEING DOING. It may provide further grounding for what you are doing. Thanks for your thoughts!
Reply to this
Thanks for stopping by and adding that resource, Lee. Readers who want to find out more about the book Leadership: Thinking, Being, Doing can find out more on Amazon.
Reply to this
Hey Wally,
Another spot on article.
Performance reviews are all about having regular, intelligent leadership conversations.
Alas I was speaking to one relatively senior manager the other day who seemed quite proud of the fact that most of his organization conducted their annual reviews online - not even a hint of a conversation. I suggested he was missing the point in, erm, rather forceful terms.
Reply to this
Thanks for adding that. I like the phrase "regular, intelligent leadership conversations."
The reason many senior managers and other managers my age don't get it is that we came up at a time when doing performance appraisals was an unquestioned value. Many of us have come to the defense of the ritual instead of reviewing the results.
Reply to this
Wally:
Great post. I particularly appreciate your call to "Hold them accountable for their supervisory behavior" and "Support them on the job". Too often, we provide supervisors with the training and the tools, but there are no consequences for ignoring them or simply doing a half-baked job. Or we neglect to recognize and support the ones who invest the time and effort it takes to do this well.
Reply to this
Thanks for the comment, Ann. I think you've zeroed in on two important things. We don't treat supervisors the way we expect them to treat their team members.
Reply to this
In today's large, multi-nationals, the physical ability to do this has largely disappeared due to the fact that a large percentage ~50%? of people's supervision is not local! I think that's where a lot of the problems come from.
In addition, the turnover of supervision is so fast that they really don't know enough about what their subordinates do to give meaningful day-to-day feedback. It's all saved for the yearly ritual.
Thanks for your article.
Reply to this
Thanks for both those observations. Remote supervision is becoming a fact of life and we're learning new ways to handle it. Years ago I urged supervisors to "show up a lot." Now that's changed to "touch base a lot."
As for supervisory turnover, I think a lot of that problem has to do with poor selection and training of supervisors.
Reply to this