We have Liftoff!
|
Subscribe to the Three Star Leadership Blog |
| The Working Supervisor's Support Kit is a collection of information and tools to help working supervisors do a better job. It's based on what Wally's learned in over twenty years of supervisory skills training. |
| Follow me on Twitter |
| For weekly tips and resources pointers, check Wally's Three Star Leadership Letter |
| Find out more about having Wally speak to your company or convention. |
| Find out more about Wally's coaching services. |
|
|
Forty years ago this morning, at 9:32 AM, Eastern Daylight Time, the Apollo 11 mission to take human beings to the moon lifted off the launch pad and began its historic journey. Like all events and projects, the mission has a story.
For all practical purposes, that story began on October 4, 1957. That's the day that the Soviet Union launched Sputnik and punched American confidence in the stomach.
Programs to improve science and engineering education suddenly were more important. Those of us at the Bronx High School of Science felt like we were on the leading edge of history.
On May 25, 1961 a young and charismatic President set the goal of sending human beings to the moon and returning them safely to earth within a decade. It was a huge challenge.
"If we can send people to the moon, why can't we …"
The space program has become the model for great goal achievement. Like most great achievements, it was both more and less than the myth.
By the time of the Apollo launch, the President who offered that challenge to the Congress had been assassinated. The Apollo mission lifted off from the re-named "Kennedy Space Center."
The president at the time was Richard Nixon and the moon mission gave Americans an opportunity to focus on something besides the biggest challenge of the time: the Viet Nam War and the protests against it. We could forget for a moment or two that both Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr. had been killed about a year before.
On TV, there was space travel in the form of the original Star Trek series. It was humanistic and hopeful. Real space travel was much more dangerous.
In 1966, Gemini 8 narrowly escaped disaster when the spacecraft began spinning out of control because of a misfiring rocket. Neil Armstrong managed to fly the spacecraft to a safe landing after a harrowing and nearly horrific mission.
The horror happened a year later. Astronauts Gus Grissom, Ed White and Roger Chaffee were incinerated in a fire in their cockpit. The program paused for grief, slowed, but did not stop.
It was all new and it was all potentially dangerous. No one knew what living organisms might attach themselves to astronauts on the moon or sneak a ride to earth on their spacecraft. No one knew if all the equipment would work as planned and practiced.
Prayer services were held as the astronauts lifted off and headed for the moon. Prayer vigils would continue until the safe homecoming prayed for.
Boss's Bottom Line
Every big project has a story. Always ask: "What's the story of this? How did we get to this point?"
Every big project has a context. The state of the world and your company and your team are all part of the context.
Apollo 11 had a backup crew that would have gone to the moon if any one of the primary crew had been unable to fly. Teamwork matters.
No matter how big or important a project is, there are always other important things happening. People have more than one priority.


Great bottom line tips from this inspiring bit of history. It was certainly an inspiring time. Funny how a major initiative can be such a potent motivator for everyone, even those of us who had to figure out model making well enough to get to the more complicated Saturn V model kits.
Reply to this
Thanks for coming by, Fred. There were sure a lot of people inspired by the space program. I think, though, that for many people, for most of the time, other things were more important or, at least, more pressing. When new missions were launched interest perked up, only to drop away again after splashdown.
Reply to this
And less than a year later,
"Houston, we've had a problem."
I'm curious to know what your thoughts are of a "successful failure" in today's environment.
Good post Wally...
Reply to this
Thanks for coming by and for the kind words, Scott. I've got an unconventional view of that issue. Seems to me like we spend too much time on judging the success/failure of our trials. I'd rather have us see trials as experiments that we learn from regardless of outcome.
Reply to this