1/10/10: Leadership Reading to Start Your Week
|
Subscribe to the Three Star Leadership Blog |
| The Working Supervisor's Support Kit is a collection of information and tools to help working supervisors do a better job. It's based on what Wally's learned in over twenty years of supervisory skills training. |
| Follow me on Twitter |
| For weekly tips and resources pointers, check Wally's Three Star Leadership Letter |
| Find out more about having Wally speak to your company or convention. |
| Find out more about Wally's coaching services. |
|
|
Here are five choice articles from the business press to start off your work week. I'm pointing you to articles about "disposable" workers, engagement, Carol Bartz, Alan Mulally, and "getting under the tank."
From Business Week: The Disposable Worker
"Pay is falling, benefits are vanishing, and no one's job is secure. How companies are making the era of the temp more than temporary."
Wally's Comment: Every time I think we've turned the corner and begun to understand that "People are people and parts is parts," I read an article like this one. The concept of imagining people as parts to be plugged into your well-engineered machine when needed and left in the parts bin when they're not should be a relic of the "Scientific Management" era. But it's not. It may work if you don't need people to bring their brains to work, and if their knowledge and relationships don't matter. I just can't think of a business where that's true.
From Workforce Management: Employee Engagement: Define It, Measure It and Put It to Work in Your Organizations
"Research by APQC, one of the leading proponents of process and performance improvement, has yielded key insights into what engagement is, how it can be measured and how it can be integrated into organizational culture."
Wally's Comment: As I wrote in "Why Engagement May be the Best Management Voodoo Ever," the biggest single problem with employee engagement is that there are at least as many definitions of it as there are consultants wanting to sell you a magic potion to make it happen. APQC, in its very engineering way, suggests that you should define engagement for yourself in a way that you will be able to measure it.
From Bloomberg: Yahoo CEO Gives Herself B-Minus Grade in First Year
"Carol Bartz gives herself a B-minus in her first year as chief executive officer of Yahoo! Inc., saying she could have moved faster to reorganize the company and strike a Web-search agreement with Microsoft Corp."
Wally's Comment: Carol Bartz is a CEO who expresses her thoughts and judgments clearly and helpfully. In this article she reviews her first year on the job at Yahoo, the company that seemed unable to define itself before she came along. For an idea of what her standards are, you may also want to read her recent interview in the Economist titled "Leadership in the information age."
From the NY Times: Ford’s Bet: It’s a Small World After All
"Yet three years into his tenure as chief executive — and with a host of still nettlesome challenges awaiting him — Mr. Mulally has thus far proved to be the unifying figure that Ford has needed for decades."
Wally's Comment: When Alan Mulally took over at Ford in 2006, I thought he was a competent executive who would run aground on the rocks and shoals of Ford's culture. I was wrong. After three years we can say two things. First, he's done a great job and led some major changes. Second, he just might pull this off.
For more perspective on this great article, check out a NY Times interview with Mulally from September 2009 and a piece from Business Week, "The Outsider at Ford," from March of the same year.
From Forbes Thought Leaders: "He's under the tank, sir" - Lead by Example
"My platoon was out in the field on training exercises. We had been out there for about two weeks so we all smelled kind of "ripe" at that point. One of the more senior officers in my battalion came to my unit's area to see how things were going. This "gentleman" personified the term - he was an "officer's officer" (versus being a "soldier's officer" which we'll explore in a moment)."
Wally's Comment: This was first posted in 2007, but I just discovered it and it's good enough to break my "only from the last week" rule. If you are a boss, anywhere and at any level, make this one a must-read. You may want to bookmark it.
Wally's Working Supervisor's Support Kit is a collection of information and tools to help working supervisors do a better job. It's based on what Wally's learned in over twenty years of supervisory skills training. Click here to check it out.


Wally
Thanks for the update.
RE employee engagement:
A reason for the plethora of measures and the confusion on definitions is that consulting companies use proprietary measures that avoid the scrutiny of independent research. This produces sloppy concepts that overlap with existing concepts and fail to replicate over time. For example, in the article you cite, APQC describes engagement as a amalgam of satisfaction commitment and retention commitments. The field already has these constructs and nothing is gained by mushing them together and calling them engagement.
For me, engagement is a distinct psychological state of energy, involvement, dedication, and efficacy. It's the opposite of burnout. It's quite measurable and is responsive to good management.
All the best,
Michael
www.workengagement.com
Reply to this
Thanks, Michael. I always appreciate the thoughtful perspectives you bring to the table. I may be reading the article slightly differently from you. My understanding was that AQPC was more in the position of suggesting that companies develop a measure of engagement, rather than sharing a single definition for all to use.
I like the simplicity of your construct but I also follow Whitehead in seeking simplicity but distrusting it. I find it easier to think of "engagement" as an emergent property of an organizational system. I think it is inherently unmeasureable in the same way that "joy" is unmeasureable. And the more I look at the way people contribute and interact in the workplace, the less I'm sure that "engagement" has the magical powers attributed to it.
Reply to this
Comment He's under the tank sir.
Many years ago as a new line manager I had a similar experience, which turned out to be the single most important impression I gave to my factory employees. I was a "bean counter" who became a factory manager. My eng'r manager was explaining why he needed some new equipment to improve a process. I am not a technical person and needed to see what he proposed. One morning at 6:00 AM we both were in jeans and in the rafters of the building looking at the current and proposed new process. At 7:00 AM the factory guys were on the floor amazed to see the "bean counter" crawling the equipment. At that moment, everything changed, I gained there support and respect. I became someone who wanted to help them. They now offered solutions to help me help them.
Russ
Reply to this
Thanks for sharing that great story, Russ. I've listened to experienced and effective managers share stories like that time and time again. I love hearing every one of them because they're reminders that the strongest thing we have going for us is our humanity.
Reply to this
Mulally so far has done a phenomenal job of turning Ford around and is directly responsible for gaining traction around his Vision. From my seat, Mulally deserves to be named CEO of the Year. Although he may not want the title, simply because he is so focused on making Ford a world contender once again.
Reply to this
Thanks for coming by, Rodney. I think he has done a spectacular job so far. And I think he's starting to get recognition for it. I think that when this is done it will be a great story to write.
Reply to this